• Hot!
      Martin Scorsese has always been a deeply personal filmmaker, but his recent output has been astonishingly intimate. Hugo, both his first family-friendly and 3D film, takes this trend to new heights, overcoming the technical challenges of the new format, as well as infusing the entire work with his influence. It's nothing short of a brilliant fable and manages a bridge between orphaned children (future generations) and disintegrating film prints (past treasures) by way of their ability to save and be saved. Scorsese can be seen in Hugo (he grew up a solitary, asthmatic child without many friends) and Melies (an aging man with reverence for magic and imagination, especially expressed through movies); the love and appreciation for cinema is felt throughout with factual nuggets and a wistful montage of early film history. Melancholic undertones add layers to what Scorsese must feel is the end of an era but his optimism conquers. A sincere, thrilling, masterful achievement. A must-see.
      • Tony le Stephanois
        Tony le Stephanois Glad to hear it. I'm heading out tomorrow to see it.
        7 months
        Vote
      • Alicia [99%]
        Alicia [99%] Thanks for giving this a decent review for me!
        7 months
        Vote
      • Vanessa
        Vanessa I saw it today & your review is perfection. I loved this movie & did not go in expecting it to be what it is. I had the mistaken idea it was full of fantasy imagery & was so pleasantly surprised at how much more it was. Scorsese has outdone himself with this treasure.
        7 months
        Vote
      • Moviegeekblog
        Moviegeekblog For all its camera swoops and chases the film never manages raise the level of excitement. Yes, it does look good and the 3D is some of the best we've seen, but it all gets a bit boring after a while. For a film so concerned about preserving the art of story-telling, it's surprising to see how it fails to actually tell a story! I wanted to like it a lot more than I did... My full review wp.me/p19wJ2-s6
        6 months
        Vote
      • Dan Chung
        Dan Chung @MoviegeekBlog Checked out your review and will have to respectfully disagree. I think it told a story quite well (but either way, would credit the source material over Scorsese). If anything, Marty has managed to infuse this fantasy tale with an adult tone and reflected his personality within that (a rare feat), while additionally transforming it into an allegory for preserving history as we move into the future (the imagery is not accidental: clocks, orphans, trains). It's a difficult thing when criticizing cinema because the audience can never really know the director's intentions. However, as a reviewer, I think it's vital to disconnect preconceived notions (such as ideas about storytelling you feel Hugo did not fit into) and just experiencing what is presented.
        6 months
        Vote(1)
      • Moviegeekblog
        Moviegeekblog I came in as open-minded as I possibly could (in fact I was ready to love it), but I just thought it was a bit too loose and baggy. The pacing was all off, the comedy didn't work and in the end I was just a bit bored by it. I appreciate the effort but I didn't think it worked as a kids-film which is what it should have been first and foremost. As I said, Marty tried too hard, but beyond the allegorical imagery and the nice message about preserving stories, there must be a strong enough character to take you through the film and Hugo was certainly not the one.
        6 months
        Vote
      • Dan Chung
        Dan Chung @MoviegeekBlog Definitely hear what you're saying, but why should it have been a kids film first and foremost?
        6 months
        Vote(1)
      • Moviegeekblog
        Moviegeekblog that's how it's sold to us (from the trailer, the poster and the slapstick humour throughout)
        6 months
        Vote
      • Dan Chung
        Dan Chung @MoviegeekBlog That's part of what I meant about disconnecting preconceived notions - ignoring the way the movie is marketed/advertised/sold. If anything, I would classify it as a family movie (not just for kids), but even that does not do it justice. I agree that it's being hocked as a holiday kid extravaganza, but I think it's far more than that.
        6 months
        Vote(2)
      Press enter when you are done typing.

Made in New York City | Copyright 2009-2012, AdaptiveBlue, Inc